Sunday, November 23, 2008

What is next in the semiconductor industry?

Semiconductor Industry Insights, Dew Drops, Ravichander Rao

Amid the industry downturn, economic recession and job losses, like everyone else I am also asking what is next? Is this the worst yet or there is more to come? This crisis seems like a long dark tunnel with no end to it. But history has shown that every crisis has been overcome no matter how big the crisis was. If so is the case, can one predict what will the next boom be?

On Friday I was reading an article related to my industry, where I found the chart shown below. It shows which technology was released (or was at its peak?) during which year and where was the semiconductor technology at that point of time.


From a cursory look, it is easy to say - one technology lead to the other. Integrated circuits brought PC, PC brought Windows, Windows brought Internet, Internet brought Broadband...As it happens with any new technology, each of these technologies would have had been received with skepticism before they were adopted and became successful. No one would have accepted when the PC and Windows were released that they would be a common household thing in the future. No one would have agreed that a common man wants broadband speed or later wireless connection. But that is how the progression works. The other observation is, while the technology innovation is additive, the semiconductor is shrinking (or subtractive) the design rule.
Now the big question is, how did these innovations become big enough to become a boom? The answer lies in how these got adopted. Windows, Internet and Broadband have a common pattern. They emerged because there was a need at first in the big companies, then its development lead to its adoption in the universities, where it developed even further, then it got adopted by small companies and eventually they achieved boom when the common man adopted the technology. However, the LCD, Netbooks and Smart Phones, they haven't reached the potential yet. They also skipped some of the adoption steps that the other three technologies followed. Perhaps these steps are essential part of the process so that product gets refined before it gets adopted by the next market. Besides, I wonder if there is a real need or application for LCD, Netbooks or the Smart Phones at the university or small companies? If they do not find applications in these two places, why would there be a need for these in the household? Probably this is one of the reasons why there is no boom in the 2000s after the broadband boom. In my opinion, LCD and netbooks have already reached their maturity in terms the number of applications where they are useful. So the only hope now lies on the Smart Phones.
If Smart Phones are to become the next boom, how is that going to be possible? First thing is that it should find applications for the common man. This in effect will give him reasons to buy. Unless the common man buys the Smart Phone it won't be boom but a fizz. Some ways to make a Smart Phone work for a common man is to build in more intelligence into it, such that it identifies a person by feel of touch, softness of grip, fingerprints, etc. The intelligence gives confidence to end user that even it is lost, it cannot be misused. Once this has been achieved, it could be used as a single solution for many operations such as - a key for opening the garage door, car door or office door, as an ID for managing bank accounts, and for all other facilities that a Smart Phone offers today. This is boom could provide some impetus to the economy and will sow the seeds for the next boom.
What could be the innovation beyond Smart Phone? There is a limitation to additive and subtractive innovations. Beyond a point they hit a wall, and cost of innovation become no longer sustainable. Addition of more feature to Smart Phone would make it highly complex. Additionally, the semiconductor manufacturers are finding technology barriers with the subtractive innovation. So definitely the next boom will not be along lines of Windows or Broadband innovation. There will be a focus shift, and perhaps it could be reversing the innovation approaches - substantive innovation for the technology to make the products simpler yet more powerful and additive innovation for the semiconductor manufacturing so that gate size reduction no longer holds the key to the processor performance.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Management Lessons From A Roadside in India

Management through common sense, Dew Drops, Ravichander Rao

Management at a very high level is, providing a guiding path using ones common sense. The common sense, so to speak is not a generally known to everyone, though it is freely available. Only a few people discover or become aware that common sense is freely available, and it is for us to obtain it. There are various ways to acquire common sense - reading books, going to the school, experience in lifetime, and by observation. Of all the four, observation is the least exploited method, though it is the most powerful. The power of observation lets a person to bring learnings from superficially totally disconnected things. For instance, the Shinkansen's (Japanese bullet train) cockpit was designed based on the kingfisher's beak to improve the aerodynamics. There are many more such examples. If you are more interested, then watch this video on Biomimicry by Janine Benyus <<http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Janine+Benyus&hl=en&emb=0&aq=f#>>

Most of the common sense can be learnt by observing people on a roadside in India or watching traditional home. Most of the presentation skills can be learnt by observing how a grandmother tells a story without any slides. Inotations, rhythm of the voice, hand gestures, conviction...all are used to make the story so compelling that kids and adults both want to listen to the same story again and again. Ram Charan the management guru mentions in his book - "What a CEO wants you to know" that he learnt balance of volume and velocity for making profit by observing the vegetable vendors of India. There are other interesting examples along these lines which I would like to share with you.

The balloonwala or the person selling balloons offers one of the best lessons in running a business that no other book can teach. His customers are young kids whom he can sell only by attracting their attention and offering their parents a bargain. His tools are balloons of various colors and shapes, his imagination and a few side skills - such ability to play flute and casual conversation. He creates various colorful forms utilizing the fully inflated balloons. Some are shaped as a flowers and some are shaped as swords, using some round ones, a few long ones, a heart shaped, etc. Then he walks on the streets, stands in park and in a crowded area, and plays nice music on his flute to catch the attention of the children.

The balloonwala is a CEO of an organization. Metaphorically, the balloons of various shapes and sizes are his resources, flute and color of balloon are his marketing tools, how many forms and how many numbers he makes is the manufacturing, locations where he stands are places/market, various forms he creates are the products, the children are the direct customers and parents the sales department. The balloons come in different shapes and sizes are the people with different skills and attitudes, they need to be managed and valued for the unique strengths that they bring to organization. If he employs all round ones or all long ones, or if wishes to convert all the round ones to all long ones or vice-versa, he cannot create the forms/products he desires to. This will lead to business collapse. Without the skills in flute playing or without multiple bright colored balloons, his ability to attract children will be limited. If stands in a remote corner he cannot make any sell. Even if he does all of this correctly, he still cannot sell a balloon, if he cannot negotiate a bargain price with their parents. Most important of the all, he needs to ensure that he makes right amount of products so that he can suistain the product to its full potential (keep them fully inflated) and also make profit to take away to his home. Now think about it, who taught the balloonwala all these things? For him this is a common sense, but in the business school - it is management lesson on product, place, pricing and inventory management.

There is one more mataphor - driving a vehicle, which provides me a great insight. While driving a car, one has to follow the rules of the road one is driving on. The roads in India can be crowded and chaotic for someone who is driving there for the first time. But for the daily commuters, it is a normal traffic, and they know how to wade through it. The drivers in India are so successful at it because they understand the human behavior or response to the other persons' action. This helps them in avoiding accidents. While traffic in the US is so fast paced that one would think there would always be accidents. In both the cases, the systems have evolved so much so that, there are not accidents every minute, which one would not expect in such systems! The drivers in the US follow the strict driving rules to avoid the accidents. These two different driving conditions are the two different business environments or cultures. One must learn how to wade through by understanding the differences.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Let us go to arboretum and see some trees...

Receding Tree Cover, Dew Drops, Ravichander Rao

This thought prompted in my mind just out of the blue. I was sitting in front of my laptop reading something on the subprime loan crisis. A picture of a row full of houses with little patch of green, popped-up this thought - the rate at which the houses are getting built and the cities are spreading, will we be seeing trees only in the arboretum in the future?

Looking at Bangalore, which used to be haven for greenery, is now in state of white mess (concrete walls) all over the place. The white space is more dominant than the green patches. If you want to believe it by seeing, check on the google earth. It is hard to find even the mud patches (not the pot-holes), where one could grow something. Furthermore, with the city still growing steadily, the situation seems to be getting out of control.


Trees moving away from the city. The dark green region is the tree and the gray is the white mess. Nagoya, Japan from Plane.
With no land to spare for the trees, aren't the tree metaphorically relocating away from the city? Isn't this similar to what happened to the forests and hence to animals living in it? The animals and some of the domestic birds they are being spotted so rarely these days, that one has to go to a zoo to see them. Probably soon we have to go an arboretum to see the once ubiquitous Asopalav, Gulmohar or tree of such likes...

Sunday, July 13, 2008

Crazy Driving Habits in India

Show off on the Road, Dew Drop, Ravichander Rao

Road and traffic conditions in India are horrible. Pot-holes are every few meters, roads are narrower and congested, lanes markers do not mean much, auto driver thinks he is the best driver and manouvers his vehicle through every inch of the available space to get a head of others, motor cyclist wants to impress people with his antics, etc.

Over the internet, I found some of the craziest videos whose links are below:







What should be fixed first - the authority of the traffic police or the casual attitude towards errants or road behavior of oneself? There is need for fixing one thing at a time to get a better traffic condition.

Saturday, April 05, 2008

Is MBA necessary?

Is MBA Worth It? Should I do MBA? Who Should Do MBA? Dew Drops, Ravichander Rao

Is it necessary to get an MBA degree to get to the position of CEO? I believe this question summarizes what I have been trying to answer to figure out. Every time I consider the MBA option, I search for answers to very fundamental questions - what specialization, can't it be learnt or acquired, is management about a degree, what traits are required, and what do I expect my life to be after MBA? Additionally, considering the expenses, motivation and time that will be required to get the degree, the task is daunting, and I am convinced that the timing has to be right.

First things first - why I need MBA and what do I want it to do for me. I have tried to answer these for myself by talking to a few trusted people, reading books, searching Internet, and some by pondering over the daily experiences, but haven't been able to convince myself to commit to MBA.

First of all the cost associated with the degree is humongous. The first 5 years will be spent on breaking-even and the next 5 years will be spent on making up for the lost savings. Does this mean more work and more stress, and less time for oneself till one break-evens? This is the most draining thought.

To figure out if this knowledge can be acquired by reading, I have tried to search the available literature and landed on something called as a personal MBA. This is school of thought suggests skills and knowledge acquired in MBA programs can also be acquired by reading books from certain categories. More details could be found here http://personalmba.com/manifesto/

But the best advices and thoughts as usual come from people who are there where you aspire to be and they have done it themselves without that degree. I have been lucky to encounter such people. Their advice is very practical - MBA is probably the last resort, there is nothing to do after MBA, so do it when it is absolutely must. And, before MBA should happen one must understand that getting into management requires personality overhauling. One must learn to lead, articulate thoughts, face and work with the conflicts, find opportunities that enhances business prospects, etc.

The more I ponder over this, the more I feel - it has to wait for a while...If I am able to do all of these without going to the MBA program, then why need an MBA degree?

My after thoughts having an MBA degree are here:  http://ravijrao.blogspot.sg/2012/07/is-mba-necessary-post-mba-thoughts.html

Wednesday, January 09, 2008

US Primaries: An Outsider's Perspective

US Primaries, Dew Drops, Ravichander Rao

This is the second US election that I am watching on the TV. Compared to the last one, this is one is turning out to be more interesting. What interests me is this election as an outsider is, to observe the different approaches the candidates are using.


On the Republican side, which is also the incumbent party, the candidates are using the traditional and corporate approaches to woo the voters. Senator McCain seems to be following the traditional approach, where the candidates talks about the military experience, projects done as a senate member, and the usual stuff. Whereas Senators Romney and Huckabee show a great deal of inclination towards Corporate style - dealing with numbers and demonstrating how they arrived at their decision.


On the Democrats side, the candidates are adopting: "urging", "emotional" and "repeatition" styles. Senator Obama uses a great deal of mix of "urging and repeatition" styles. In every caucus he urges the votes to stand for change and his speeches are full of exhortation. At times, it feels as if he is preparing a set of warriors who are ready to march on his orders. Senator Edwards' style is a mix of "emotion and repetition." His main issue seems to be "change" and "health care", which we keep on hearing and at times the same examples over and over again. Senator Hillary who started with a "traditional" approach has now started adopting "emotional"style. Her final day campaign at New Hampshire added a human touch to her campaign which was perhaps clearing missing in Iowa. What I like about her campaign is the fact that it uses a blend of management style and very less of "emotional and repetition". Presenting facts from the past, showing the numbers, and bringing out the issues, and presenting all these in a powered speech without "urging" makes her speech very interesting.


As they move on towards the next caucus, let us see what new styles emerge and how they improvise.